Who wins the public tenders in Sofia Municipality

1. 1921
   Alve Konsult EOOD 3 contracts · 1 buyer

   • Main client: Agentsia "Patna Infrastruktura": 3 of 3 contracts, 100% of the value.
   • No competition: The only bidder in 2 of 3 procedures won.
   €8,487 0%
2. 1922
   ASOTSIATSIA "DOZA OBICH" Sdruzhenie 1 contract · 1 buyer

   • One contract: A contract won with Ministerstvo na Zdraveopazvaneto worth €8,487.
   • Wins against competition: 2 bids were submitted in the procedure.
   €8,487 0%
3. 1923
   Universal-Zh EOOD 2 contracts · 2 buyers

   • One large contract: Tsentralno voenno okrazhie: one contract worth €7,641, 90% of the value of everything won.
   €8,459 0%
4. 1924
   Grizha i chistota OOD 1 contract · 1 buyer

   • One contract: A contract won with Meditsinski tsentar "Lozenets" EOOD worth €8,409.
   • No competition: The only bidder in the procedure.
   €8,409 0%
5. 1925
   Popko EOOD гр. София · 4 contracts · 1 buyer

   • Main client: Sofiyski Universitet "Sv.kliment Ohridski": 4 of 4 contracts, 100% of the value.
   • Wins against competition: 19,5 bids on average in the procedures it has won.
   • Specialisation: 75% of the contracts are in the “Laboratory and measuring equipment” sector.
   €8,228 0%
6. 1926
   Ikar Konsult AD гр. София · 1 contract · 1 buyer

   • One contract: A contract won with Rayon "Poduyane" worth €8,180.
   • No competition: The only bidder in the procedure.
   €8,180 0%
7. 1927
   Vioniks EOOD гр. София · 1 contract · 1 buyer

   • One contract: A contract won with Sofiyska Filharmonia worth €8,100.
   • Wins against competition: 3 bids were submitted in the procedure.
   €8,100 0%
8. 1928
   Vmv-2 EOOD 1 contract · 1 buyer

   • One contract: A contract won with Voennovazdushni sili worth €8,065.
   • Wins against competition: 4 bids were submitted in the procedure.
   €8,065 0%
9. 1929
   Montana - Avtobusen Transport EOOD гр. София · 1 contract · 1 buyer

   • One contract: A contract won with "BDZH-Patnicheski Prevozi" Sakrateno "BDZH - Pp" EOOD worth €8,053.
   • Wins against competition: 2 bids were submitted in the procedure.
   €8,053 0%
10. 1930
    Medikal Imidzh OOD 1 contract · 1 buyer

    • One contract: A contract won with Vtora Spetsializirana Akushero-Ginekologichna Bolnitsa za Aktivno… worth €8,025.
    • Wins against competition: 14 bids were submitted in the procedure.
    €8,025 0%
11. 1931
    SAUCHASTIE Sdruzhenie 1 contract · 1 buyer

    • One contract: A contract won with Ministerstvo na Zdraveopazvaneto worth €7,931.
    • Wins against competition: 2 bids were submitted in the procedure.
    €7,931 0%
12. 1932
    Patproekt EOOD 2 contracts · 2 buyers

    • One large contract: Agentsia "Patna Infrastruktura": one contract worth €4,928, 62% of the value of everything won.
    • Wins against competition: 7,5 bids on average in the procedures it has won.
    €7,928 0%
13. 1933
    Test Solyushans OOD гр. София · 1 contract · 1 buyer

    • One contract: A contract won with Institut po Opticheski Materiali i Tehnologii "Akademik Yordan… worth €7,890.
    • Wins against competition: 10 bids were submitted in the procedure.
    €7,890 0%
14. 1934
    ET Reklamna Agentsia Ab - Anelia Minkova 1 contract · 1 buyer

    • One contract: A contract won with Stolichna Obshtina worth €7,874.
    • Wins against competition: 5 bids were submitted in the procedure.
    €7,874 0%
15. 1935
    Bioelement EOOD гр. София · 3 contracts · 1 buyer

    • Main client: Balgarska Federatsia po Hudozhestvena Gimnastika Sdruzhenie: 3 of 3 contracts, 100% of the value.
    • Wins against competition: 30 bids on average in the procedures it has won.
    • Specialisation: 100% of the contracts are in the “Medical equipment and pharmaceuticals” sector.
    €7,830 0%
16. 1936
    Kristal 2007 EOOD 1 contract · 1 buyer

    • One contract: A contract won with Rayon "Vrabnitsa" worth €7,791.
    • No competition: The only bidder in the procedure.
    €7,791 0%
17. 1937
    Vivko Komers EOOD гр. Видин · 1 contract · 1 buyer

    • One contract: A contract won with Komandvane za komunikatsionno-informatsionna poddrazhka i… worth €7,682.
    • Wins against competition: 3 bids were submitted in the procedure.
    €7,682 0%
18. 1938
    Sofinformprodukt-Grozdanov EOOD гр. София · 5 contracts · 4 buyers

    • One large contract: Spetsializirana bolnitsa za aktivno lechenie po detski bolesti –…: one contract worth €5,494, 72% of the value of everything won.
    • Wins against competition: 15,2 bids on average in the procedures it has won.
    • Specialisation: 100% of the contracts are in the “Medical equipment and pharmaceuticals” sector.
    €7,636 0%
19. 1939
    Profayar EOOD гр. Шумен · 1 contract · 1 buyer

    • One contract: A contract won with Natsionalna Agentsia za Prihodite worth €7,567.
    • Wins against competition: 5 bids were submitted in the procedure.
    €7,567 0%
20. 1940
    Imessa Konsult EOOD 1 contract · 1 buyer

    • One contract: A contract won with Meditsinski Universitet worth €7,546.
    • Wins against competition: 7 bids were submitted in the procedure.
    €7,546 0%
21. 1941
    Mirikal EOOD 1 contract · 1 buyer

    • One contract: A contract won with Rayon "Vrabnitsa" worth €7,503.
    • No competition: The only bidder in the procedure.
    €7,503 0%
22. 1942
    Printrefil EOOD 1 contract · 1 buyer

    • One contract: A contract won with Direktsia Upravlenie na sobstvenostta i sotsialni deynosti /DUSSD/… worth €7,502.
    • Wins against competition: 3 bids were submitted in the procedure.
    €7,502 0%
23. 1943
    Tim Bilding Grups EOOD гр. Пловдив · 2 contracts · 2 buyers

    • One large contract: Spetsializirana Bolnitsa za Aktivno Lechenie na Hematologichni…: one contract worth €5,177, 69% of the value of everything won.
    • Wins against competition: 6,5 bids on average in the procedures it has won.
    €7,485 0%
24. 1944
    Strol-1000 AD гр. София · 6 contracts · 2 buyers

    • Main client: Agentsia "Patna Infrastruktura": 3 of 6 contracts, 100% of the value.
    • No competition: The only bidder in 3 of 6 procedures won.
    • Low price: On average 29% below the estimated value in 3 contracts.
    €7,477 0%
25. 1945
    S i s Konsulti OOD 1 contract · 1 buyer

    • One contract: A contract won with Universitet za Natsionalno i Svetovno Stopanstvo worth €7,442.
    €7,442 0%
26. 1946
    Meditsinski Tsentar Harmonia OOD 1 contract · 1 buyer

    • One contract: A contract won with Stolichna Obshtina worth €7,313.
    • Wins against competition: 7 bids were submitted in the procedure.
    €7,313 0%
27. 1947
    Prosveta AZBUKI OOD 5 contracts · 5 buyers

    • Specialisation: 100% of the contracts are in the “Printed matter” sector.
    • Many clients: Contracts with 5 different buyers.
    €7,229 0%
28. 1948
    Vodosnabdyavane i Kanalizatsia OOD 2 contracts · 2 buyers

    • One large contract: Glavna Direktsia Zhandarmeria, Spetsialni Operatsii i Borba s…: one contract worth €5,500, 76% of the value of everything won.
    €7,200 0%
29. 1949
    Ralev.kom EOOD 1 contract · 1 buyer

    • One contract: A contract won with Tsentralna Izbiratelna Komisia worth €6,855.
    • Wins against competition: 6 bids were submitted in the procedure.
    €6,855 0%
30. 1950
    Nh Balgaria EOOD 1 contract · 1 buyer

    • One contract: A contract won with Elektrorazpredelitelni mrezhi Zapad EAD worth €6,777.
    • No competition: The only bidder in the procedure.
    €6,777 0%
31. 1951
    Kopi Kontrol Kampani EOOD 2 contracts · 2 buyers

    • One large contract: Regionalna Direktsia za Sotsialno Podpomagane - Sofia-Grad: one contract worth €3,579, 54% of the value of everything won.
    • Price at the estimate: The contracts were signed at or very close to the estimated value.
    €6,647 0%
32. 1952
    Konsortsium Tehnokom 1 contract · 1 buyer

    • One contract: A contract won with Rayon "Nadezhda" worth €6,550.
    • No competition: The only bidder in the procedure.
    €6,550 0%
33. 1953
    Meditsinska Tehnika-2 OOD 1 contract · 1 buyer

    • One contract: A contract won with Mnogoprofilna bolnitsa za aktivno lechenie "Natsionalna… worth €6,442.
    • Wins against competition: 8 bids were submitted in the procedure.
    €6,442 0%
34. 1954
    Reymed 09 EOOD 1 contract · 1 buyer

    • One contract: A contract won with Tsentar za Speshna Meditsinska Pomosht po Vazduha worth €6,441.
    • Wins against competition: 7 bids were submitted in the procedure.
    €6,441 0%
35. 1955
    Vodosnabdyavane i Kanalizatsia EOOD 3 contracts · 2 buyers

    • Main client: Glavna direktsia "Granichna politsia" /GDGP/ kam Ministerstvo na…: 2 of 3 contracts, 74% of the value.
    €6,433 0%
36. 1956
    Vertikal 1 EOOD 3 contracts · 2 buyers

    • Main client: Natsionalna Agentsia za Prihodite: 2 of 3 contracts, 100% of the value.
    • No competition: The only bidder in 3 of 3 procedures won.
    • Specialisation: 100% of the contracts are in the “Repair and maintenance” sector.
    €6,238 0%
37. 1957
    Atama Uelnes End Spa OOD 1 contract · 1 buyer

    • One contract: A contract won with Meditsinski Universitet worth €6,237.
    • Wins against competition: 47 bids were submitted in the procedure.
    €6,237 0%
38. 1958
    Ka Proekt - 2 EOOD 1 contract · 1 buyer

    • One contract: A contract won with Natsionalna Agentsia za Prihodite worth €6,136.
    • No competition: The only bidder in the procedure.
    €6,136 0%
39. 1959
    Medikal Ekspres AD гр. София · 2 contracts · 2 buyers

    • One large contract: Ministerstvo na Zdraveopazvaneto: one contract worth €4,908, 83% of the value of everything won.
    • Wins against competition: 4 bids on average in the procedures it has won.
    €5,933 0%
40. 1960
    Satori Ko EOOD 1 contract · 1 buyer

    • One contract: A contract won with Meditsinski Universitet worth €5,879.
    • Wins against competition: 4 bids were submitted in the procedure.
    €5,879 0%

The reasons are derived automatically from the public data on contracts awarded over the last 12 months (CAIS EOP and TED): value, buyer, number of bids, estimated value, sector and registered office in the Commercial Register. They describe what is visible in the contracts and are not an assessment of the quality or legality of the companies' work.